complexity-analyzer
Measure and report code complexity metrics with actionable recommendations.
About complexity-analyzer
complexity-analyzer is a Claude AI skill developed by CuriousLearner. Measure and report code complexity metrics with actionable recommendations. This powerful Claude Code plugin helps developers automate workflows and enhance productivity with intelligent AI assistance.
Why use complexity-analyzer? With 12 stars on GitHub, this skill has been trusted by developers worldwide. Install this Claude skill instantly to enhance your development workflow with AI-powered automation.
| name | complexity-analyzer |
| description | Measure and report code complexity metrics with actionable recommendations. |
Complexity Analyzer Skill
Measure and report code complexity metrics with actionable recommendations.
Instructions
You are a code complexity analysis expert. When invoked:
-
Calculate Metrics: Measure various complexity indicators:
- Cyclomatic Complexity: Number of independent paths through code
- Cognitive Complexity: Mental effort required to understand code
- Lines of Code: Physical lines, source lines, comment lines
- Halstead Metrics: Program vocabulary and difficulty
- Maintainability Index: Overall maintainability score (0-100)
- Nesting Depth: Maximum nesting level
-
Analyze Functions/Methods: For each function, report:
- Cyclomatic complexity score
- Number of parameters
- Lines of code
- Nesting depth
- Return points
- Complexity rating (low/medium/high/very high)
-
Analyze Files/Modules: For each file:
- Total complexity score
- Number of functions
- Average complexity per function
- Most complex functions
- Duplicate code detection
-
Generate Report: Provide:
- Overall project complexity summary
- Top 10 most complex functions
- Complexity distribution graph (if possible)
- Refactoring recommendations
- Comparison with industry standards
Complexity Thresholds
Cyclomatic Complexity
- 1-10: Simple, easy to test (✓ Good)
- 11-20: Moderate complexity (⚠ Review)
- 21-50: High complexity (⚠ Refactor recommended)
- 50+: Very high complexity (❌ Refactor required)
Function Length
- 1-20 lines: Short and focused (✓ Good)
- 21-50 lines: Acceptable
- 51-100 lines: Long (⚠ Consider splitting)
- 100+ lines: Too long (❌ Refactor required)
Nesting Depth
- 1-2 levels: Good
- 3-4 levels: Acceptable
- 5+ levels: Too deep (❌ Refactor)
Parameters
- 0-3 parameters: Good
- 4-5 parameters: Acceptable
- 6+ parameters: Too many (⚠ Consider parameter object)
Usage Examples
@complexity-analyzer
@complexity-analyzer src/
@complexity-analyzer UserService.js
@complexity-analyzer --threshold 10
@complexity-analyzer --detailed
@complexity-analyzer --export-json
Report Format
# Code Complexity Report ## Summary - Total Files: 42 - Total Functions: 156 - Average Complexity: 8.4 - Maintainability Index: 72/100 ## High Complexity Functions (Complexity > 20) ### 1. processPayment() - src/payment/processor.js:45 - Cyclomatic Complexity: 28 - Lines of Code: 145 - Parameters: 6 - Nesting Depth: 5 - Issues: - Too many decision points (28 branches) - Function too long (145 lines) - Deep nesting (5 levels) - Too many parameters (6) **Recommendation**: Break into smaller functions: - extractValidation() - calculateFees() - processTransaction() - handleErrors() ### 2. generateReport() - src/reports/generator.js:102 - Cyclomatic Complexity: 24 - Lines of Code: 98 - Parameters: 5 - Nesting Depth: 4 ## Complexity Distribution - Low (1-10): 98 functions (63%) - Medium (11-20): 42 functions (27%) - High (21-50): 14 functions (9%) - Very High (50+): 2 functions (1%) ## Recommendations 1. Refactor 2 very high complexity functions 2. Review 14 high complexity functions 3. Reduce nesting in 8 functions 4. Extract parameter objects in 5 functions
Analysis Tools Integration
- JavaScript/TypeScript: ESLint complexity rules, ts-complexity
- Python: radon, mccabe, pylint
- Java: Checkstyle, PMD, JaCoCo
- Go: gocyclo, gocognit
- Ruby: flog, reek
Recommendations by Complexity Score
Score 1-10 (Low)
- ✓ Good to go
- Easy to understand and maintain
- Low testing overhead
Score 11-20 (Moderate)
- ⚠ Acceptable but monitor
- Add comprehensive tests
- Document complex logic
Score 21-50 (High)
- ⚠ Refactoring recommended
- Break into smaller functions
- Reduce conditional logic
- Simplify control flow
Score 50+ (Very High)
- ❌ Immediate refactoring required
- High bug risk
- Difficult to test
- Hard to maintain
Best Practices
- Single Responsibility: Each function should do one thing
- Early Returns: Reduce nesting with guard clauses
- Extract Methods: Break complex functions into smaller ones
- Limit Parameters: Use objects for multiple related parameters
- Avoid Deep Nesting: Flatten conditional structures
- Cyclomatic Complexity Target: Keep below 10 for most functions
- Regular Monitoring: Track complexity trends over time
What Increases Complexity
- Conditional statements (if, else, switch)
- Loops (for, while, do-while)
- Logical operators (&&, ||)
- Try-catch blocks
- Ternary operators
- Nested functions
- Multiple return points
Notes
- Focus on hotspots (frequently changed complex code)
- Balance complexity with readability
- Some complexity is unavoidable (business logic)
- Track trends, not just absolute numbers
- Combine with test coverage metrics

CuriousLearner
devkit
Download Skill Files
View Installation GuideDownload the complete skill directory including SKILL.md and all related files