product-design

Automates design review, token extraction, component mapping, and implementation planning. Reduces design handoff from 6-10 hours to 5 minutes via direct Figma MCP integration. Auto-invoke when user mentions design review, Figma mockup, or design handoff.

About product-design

product-design is a Claude AI skill developed by alekspetrov. Automates design review, token extraction, component mapping, and implementation planning. Reduces design handoff from 6-10 hours to 5 minutes via direct Figma MCP integration. Auto-invoke when user mentions design review, Figma mockup, or design handoff. This powerful Claude Code plugin helps developers automate workflows and enhance productivity with intelligent AI assistance.

0Stars
0Forks
2025-11-02

Why use product-design? With 0 stars on GitHub, this skill has been trusted by developers worldwide. Install this Claude skill instantly to enhance your development workflow with AI-powered automation.

nameproduct-design
descriptionAutomates design review, token extraction, component mapping, and implementation planning. Reduces design handoff from 6-10 hours to 5 minutes via direct Figma MCP integration. Auto-invoke when user mentions design review, Figma mockup, or design handoff.
allowed-toolsRead, Write, Edit, Grep, Glob, Bash, Task, TodoWrite
version1.1.0

Product Design Skill

Automate design handoff from Figma to code with design system intelligence. Extract tokens, map components, detect drift, generate implementation plans.

When to Invoke

Auto-invoke when user says:

  • "Review this design"
  • "Analyze Figma mockup"
  • "Design handoff for [feature]"
  • "Check design system impact"
  • "Plan implementation for design"
  • "Extract tokens from Figma"
  • "What changed in the design?"

What This Does

5-Step Workflow:

  1. Design Analysis: Extract patterns, components, tokens from Figma
  2. Codebase Audit: Compare design vs implementation, find drift
  3. Implementation Planning: Generate phased task breakdown
  4. Task Assignment: Create Navigator task document
  5. Handoff: Ask user to review or start implementation

Time Savings: 6-10 hours → 15-20 minutes (95% reduction)

Prerequisites

Required

  1. Python Dependencies

    cd skills/product-design ./setup.sh # Automated installation # OR manually: pip install -r requirements.txt
  2. Figma Desktop (for automated workflow)

  3. Project Structure

    • .agent/design-system/ directory (created on first run)
    • Project with components (React/Vue/Svelte)

Optional (Enhanced Features)

  • Figma Enterprise: Code Connect for automatic component mapping
  • Tailwind CSS: Design token integration via @theme
  • Storybook: Component documentation and visual regression

Installation

Quick start:

cd skills/product-design ./setup.sh

See INSTALL.md for detailed installation guide and troubleshooting.

Workflow Protocol

Step 0: Check Setup (Auto-Run)

Before starting, verify Python dependencies installed:

# Get Navigator plugin path PLUGIN_PATH=$(dirname "$(dirname "$(dirname "$PWD")")") # Check if venv exists if [ ! -d "$PLUGIN_PATH/skills/product-design/venv" ]; then echo "❌ product-design skill not set up" echo "" echo "Run setup (30 seconds):" echo " cd $PLUGIN_PATH/skills/product-design && ./setup.sh" echo "" echo "Or use manual workflow (no Python needed)" exit 1 fi

If setup missing:

  • Show setup instructions
  • Offer manual workflow as alternative
  • Do not proceed with automated Figma workflow

If setup complete:

  • Continue to Step 1 (Design Analysis)

Step 1: Design Analysis

Objective: Extract design patterns from Figma or manual description

With Figma MCP (Automated) ✨ SIMPLIFIED

New Architecture (v1.1.0+): Python directly connects to Figma MCP - no manual orchestration!

# Python functions now handle MCP connection automatically from figma_mcp_client import FigmaMCPClient async with FigmaMCPClient() as client: # Progressive refinement - fetch only what's needed metadata = await client.get_metadata() components = extract_components(metadata) # Fetch details only for complex components for comp in components: if comp['complexity'] == 'high': comp['detail'] = await client.get_design_context(comp['id']) # Get design tokens variables = await client.get_variable_defs()

Workflow (fully automated):

  1. User provides Figma URL
  2. Run python3 functions/design_analyzer.py --figma-url <URL>
  3. Python connects to Figma MCP (http://127.0.0.1:3845/mcp)
  4. Fetches metadata → analyzes → fetches details only if needed
  5. Returns complete analysis

Benefits:

  • ✅ No manual MCP tool calls by Claude
  • ✅ Progressive refinement (smart token usage)
  • ✅ Automatic connection management
  • ✅ Built-in error handling

Requirements:

  • Figma Desktop running
  • MCP enabled in preferences
  • Python dependencies installed (./setup.sh)

Manual Workflow (No MCP)

**Ask user for design information**: What is the feature name? [e.g., "Dashboard Redesign"] Figma link (optional): [figma.com/file/...] **Design Tokens**: List new or modified tokens: - Colors (name: value, e.g., "primary-600: #2563EB") - Spacing (e.g., "spacing-lg: 24px") - Typography (e.g., "heading-xl: 36px/600") - Other (radius, shadow, etc.) **Components**: List components in design: - Component name - Type (atom, molecule, organism) - Variants (if any, e.g., "Button: primary/secondary, sm/md/lg") - Similar to existing component? (name if known) **Proceed to Step 2** after gathering information

Run design_analyzer.py

# Prepare input (MCP or manual JSON) # MCP: Already have /tmp/figma_metadata.json # Manual: Create JSON from user input python3 functions/design_analyzer.py \ --figma-data /tmp/figma_combined.json \ --ui-kit-inventory .agent/design-system/ui-kit-inventory.json \ --output /tmp/analysis_results.json

Analysis Output:

  • New components not in UI kit
  • Similar components (reuse opportunities)
  • New design tokens
  • Breaking changes (if any)

Step 2: Codebase Audit

Objective: Compare design vs implementation, detect drift

Token Extraction

python3 functions/token_extractor.py \ --figma-variables /tmp/figma_variables.json \ --existing-tokens .agent/design-system/design-tokens.json \ --output /tmp/token_extraction.json

Output: DTCG formatted tokens + diff summary

Component Mapping

python3 functions/component_mapper.py \ --figma-components /tmp/analysis_results.json \ --code-connect-map /tmp/figma_code_connect.json \ --project-root . \ --output /tmp/component_mappings.json

Output: Figma component → code component mappings with confidence scores

Design System Audit

# Combine data for auditor python3 functions/design_system_auditor.py \ --figma-data /tmp/combined_figma.json \ --code-data /tmp/combined_code.json \ --output /tmp/audit_results.json

Audit Results:

  • Token alignment (in sync, drift, missing, unused)
  • Component reuse opportunities
  • Tailwind config recommendations
  • Priority level (critical, high, medium, low)

Step 3: Implementation Planning

Objective: Generate phased implementation task document

Generate Task Document

python3 functions/implementation_planner.py \ --task-id "TASK-{{next_task_number}}" \ --feature-name "{{feature_name}}" \ --analysis-results /tmp/combined_analysis.json \ --review-reference ".agent/design-system/reviews/{{date}}-{{feature-slug}}.md" \ --output .agent/tasks/TASK-{{next_task_number}}-{{feature-slug}}.md

Task Document Includes:

  • Phased implementation (tokens → atoms → molecules → organisms)
  • Complexity estimates per phase
  • Acceptance criteria checklist
  • Files to modify
  • Testing strategy
  • Rollout plan

Create Design Review Report

Use template: templates/design-review-report.md

Save to: .agent/design-system/reviews/YYYY-MM-DD-{{feature-name}}.md

Contents:

  • Design analysis summary
  • Token changes (added/modified/removed)
  • Component changes (new/extended/breaking)
  • Design system impact
  • Implementation recommendations

Step 4: Task Assignment

Objective: Create task and assign context for implementation

Create PM Ticket (if configured)

**If PM tool configured** (Linear, GitHub Issues, Jira): - Create ticket with task summary - Link to task document and design review - Assign to frontend developer or team **If no PM tool**: - Skip ticket creation - Task document serves as source of truth

Update Navigator Documentation

**Update files**: 1. `.agent/tasks/TASK-{{number}}-{{feature}}.md` (created in Step 3) 2. `.agent/design-system/reviews/{{date}}-{{feature}}.md` (design review) 3. `.agent/DEVELOPMENT-README.md` (add task to index) **Use TodoWrite** to track implementation phases

Step 5: Implementation Handoff

Objective: Present results and get user decision

Present Summary

✅ Design review complete for {{Feature Name}} **Generated Documentation**: - Design review: `.agent/design-system/reviews/{{date}}-{{feature}}.md` - Implementation plan: `.agent/tasks/TASK-{{number}}-{{feature}}.md` {{#if pm_configured}}- PM ticket: {{ticket_id}} (status: ready for development){{/if}} **Summary**: - Design Tokens: {{new_count}} new, {{modified_count}} modified - Components: {{new_components}} new, {{extend_components}} to extend - Estimated Time: {{total_hours}} hours - Complexity: {{complexity_level}} {{#if breaking_changes}}- ⚠️ Breaking Changes: {{breaking_count}} component(s){{/if}} **Next Steps**: [1] Start implementation now [2] Review plan first (load task document) [3] Modify plan before starting **Recommended**: After implementation, set up visual regression testing: "Set up visual regression for {{components}}" This ensures pixel-perfect implementation and prevents future drift (15 min setup). Reply with choice or "Start implementation"

User Decision Branches

If user chooses [1] or says "Start implementation":

1. Load task document: `Read .agent/tasks/TASK-{{number}}-{{feature}}.md` 2. Load design review: `Read .agent/design-system/reviews/{{date}}-{{feature}}.md` 3. Begin Phase 1 (typically design tokens) 4. Follow autonomous completion protocol when done 5. After completion, suggest: "Set up visual regression for {{components}}" (optional but recommended)

If user chooses [2]:

1. Load and display task document 2. Highlight key phases and acceptance criteria 3. Ask: "Ready to start or need changes?"

If user chooses [3]:

1. Load task document 2. Ask what modifications needed 3. Edit task document 4. Regenerate if major changes 5. Then proceed to implementation

Predefined Functions

functions/design_analyzer.py

Purpose: Extract design patterns from Figma MCP data or manual input

Usage:

python3 functions/design_analyzer.py \ --figma-data /path/to/figma_mcp_combined.json \ --ui-kit-inventory .agent/design-system/ui-kit-inventory.json \ --output /tmp/analysis.json

Input Format (figma_mcp_combined.json):

{ "metadata": { ... }, // get_metadata response "variables": { ... }, // get_variable_defs response "code_connect_map": { ... } // get_code_connect_map response (optional) }

Output: Component analysis with categorization (atom/molecule/organism) + similarity scores


functions/token_extractor.py

Purpose: Convert Figma variables to DTCG format with diff

Usage:

python3 functions/token_extractor.py \ --figma-variables /path/to/figma_variables.json \ --existing-tokens .agent/design-system/design-tokens.json \ --format full \ --output /tmp/tokens.json

Output Formats:

  • full: DTCG tokens + diff + summary
  • tokens-only: Just DTCG tokens
  • diff-only: Just diff and summary

DTCG Format (W3C Design Tokens spec):

{ "color": { "primary": { "500": { "$value": "#3B82F6", "$type": "color", "$description": "Primary brand color" } } } }

functions/component_mapper.py

Purpose: Map Figma components to codebase components

Usage:

python3 functions/component_mapper.py \ --figma-components /path/to/analysis_results.json \ --code-connect-map /path/to/code_connect.json \ --project-root . \ --output /tmp/mappings.json

Mapping Strategy:

  1. Code Connect first (100% confidence)
  2. Fuzzy name matching (70%+ confidence)
  3. Unmapped = needs creation

Output: Mappings with confidence scores + variant prop mapping


functions/design_system_auditor.py

Purpose: Audit design system for drift and reuse opportunities

Usage:

python3 functions/design_system_auditor.py \ --figma-data /path/to/combined_figma.json \ --code-data /path/to/combined_code.json \ --output /tmp/audit.json

Audit Checks:

  • Token alignment (drift detection)
  • Component reuse opportunities (similarity >70%)
  • Unused tokens (cleanup candidates)
  • Priority level assignment

functions/implementation_planner.py

Purpose: Generate Navigator task document with phased breakdown

Usage:

python3 functions/implementation_planner.py \ --task-id "TASK-16" \ --feature-name "Dashboard Redesign" \ --analysis-results /path/to/combined_analysis.json \ --review-reference ".agent/design-system/reviews/2025-10-21-dashboard.md" \ --output .agent/tasks/TASK-16-dashboard-redesign.md

Output: Complete Navigator task document with:

  • Phased implementation (atomic design order)
  • Complexity estimates (Low/Medium/High)
  • Acceptance criteria per phase
  • Testing strategy
  • Rollout plan

Templates

templates/design-review-report.md

When: Step 3 - Creating design review documentation

Structure:

# Design Review: {{Feature Name}} **Date**: {{YYYY-MM-DD}} **Figma**: [Link]({{figma_url}}) **Reviewer**: Navigator Product Design Skill ## New Design Tokens [Token changes] ## New Components Required [Component list with categories] ## Design System Impact [High/Medium/Low impact analysis] ## Implementation Recommendations [Phased approach]

Design System Documentation Structure

Initial Setup (First Run)

mkdir -p .agent/design-system/reviews # Create initial files touch .agent/design-system/design-tokens.json touch .agent/design-system/ui-kit-inventory.json touch .agent/design-system/component-mapping.json

design-tokens.json (DTCG format):

{ "color": {}, "spacing": {}, "typography": {}, "radius": {}, "shadow": {} }

ui-kit-inventory.json:

{ "components": [ { "name": "Button", "path": "src/components/ui/Button.tsx", "category": "atom", "variants": ["primary", "secondary", "ghost"], "figma_link": "..." } ], "tokens": {} }

File Loading Strategy

Never load:

  • All design review reports (50+ files = 250k+ tokens)
  • Full Figma MCP responses (can be 350k+ tokens)

Always load when skill active:

  • ui-kit-inventory.json (~3k tokens)
  • design-tokens.json (~2k tokens)
  • Specific design review for current task (~5k tokens)

Total: ~10k tokens vs 150k+ (93% reduction)


Figma MCP Integration

MCP Server Detection

On skill invocation:

  1. Check for Figma MCP tools availability
  2. Detect local vs remote server
  3. Adjust workflow based on capabilities

Local Server (Recommended):

  • URL: http://127.0.0.1:3845/mcp
  • Tools: All (metadata, variables, code_connect, design_context)
  • Requires: Figma Desktop app running

Remote Server (Fallback):

  • URL: https://mcp.figma.com/mcp
  • Tools: Limited (no code_connect, requires explicit URLs)
  • Requires: Internet connection, explicit Figma links

Handling Token Limits

Problem: Large screens return >350k tokens (exceeds default 25k limit)

Solution:

1. Use `get_metadata` first (sparse XML, ~5k tokens) 2. Parse metadata to identify component node IDs 3. Fetch components individually via `get_design_context` 4. Aggregate results from multiple small calls **Environment Variable** (recommended): export MAX_MCP_OUTPUT_TOKENS=100000

MCP Tool Usage

get_metadata: Always first for large designs

  • Returns sparse XML with node IDs, types, names
  • Low token cost (~5-10k)
  • Use to plan component extraction strategy

get_variable_defs: Extract all design tokens

  • One call gets all variables
  • Moderate token cost (~10-20k)
  • Critical for token extraction

get_code_connect_map: Get component mappings

  • Requires Figma Enterprise plan
  • Returns node_id → code_path mappings
  • Highest confidence mappings

get_design_context: Extract component code

  • Use per-component (NOT full screen)
  • Can generate React/Vue/HTML via prompting
  • Highest token cost - use sparingly

Tailwind CSS Integration

Design Tokens → Tailwind @theme

Style Dictionary Pipeline:

# 1. Tokens extracted to design-tokens.json (DTCG format) # 2. Run Style Dictionary build npx style-dictionary build # 3. Generates tailwind-tokens.css # @theme { # --color-primary-500: #3B82F6; # --spacing-md: 16px; # } # 4. Tailwind auto-generates utilities # .bg-primary-500, .p-md, etc.

Figma Auto Layout → Tailwind Classes

Translation Rules (apply during code generation):

Direction:
  Horizontal → flex-row
  Vertical → flex-col

Spacing:
  Gap → gap-{token}
  Padding → p-{token}, px-{token}, py-{token}

Alignment:
  Start → items-start, justify-start
  Center → items-center, justify-center
  Space Between → justify-between

Sizing:
  Hug → w-auto / h-auto
  Fill → flex-1
  Fixed → w-{value} / h-{value}

Token Optimization

Navigator Principles

Load on demand:

  • Design review for current task only
  • UI kit inventory (always needed)
  • Design tokens (always needed)

Use Task agent for codebase searches:

  • Finding all component files (60-80% token savings)
  • Searching for token usage in Tailwind config
  • Analyzing component variant patterns

Compact after completion:

  • Clear context after design review
  • Preserve task document in marker
  • Clean slate for implementation

Troubleshooting

"Figma MCP tool not found"

Issue: MCP server not available

Solutions:

  1. Check Figma Desktop app is running (for local server)
  2. Verify MCP server added: claude mcp add --transport http figma-desktop http://127.0.0.1:3845/mcp
  3. Fall back to manual workflow (still provides value)

"Token limit exceeded"

Issue: get_design_context response too large

Solutions:

  1. Use get_metadata first, then fetch components individually
  2. Set MAX_MCP_OUTPUT_TOKENS=100000
  3. Break design into smaller selections in Figma

"No components found in codebase"

Issue: component_mapper.py finds no matches

Solutions:

  1. Check --project-root points to correct directory
  2. Verify component file extensions (tsx, jsx, vue)
  3. Check components aren't in excluded directories (node_modules)

"Design tokens not in DTCG format"

Issue: Existing tokens use legacy format

Solutions:

  1. Run token_extractor.py with --format tokens-only to convert
  2. Backup existing tokens first
  3. Update Style Dictionary config to read DTCG format

Success Metrics

Efficiency Gains

Before: 6-10 hours per design handoff After: 15-20 minutes Savings: 95% time reduction

Quality Metrics

  • Design system drift detected automatically
  • 100% token consistency via automated sync
  • Component reuse rate tracked
  • Implementation accuracy via acceptance criteria

Example Usage

User: "Review the dashboard redesign from Figma: https://figma.com/file/..."

Navigator:
1. Checks for Figma MCP availability
2. Extracts metadata, variables, code_connect_map
3. Runs design_analyzer.py → finds 3 new components, 12 new tokens
4. Runs token_extractor.py → generates DTCG tokens, finds 5 drift issues
5. Runs component_mapper.py → maps 2 components, 1 new needed
6. Runs design_system_auditor.py → priority: HIGH (drift detected)
7. Runs implementation_planner.py → generates TASK-17 with 3 phases
8. Creates design review report
9. Presents summary with [Start/Review/Modify] options

User: "Start implementation"

Navigator:
1. Loads TASK-17 document
2. Begins Phase 1: Design Tokens
3. Updates design-tokens.json with 12 new tokens
4. Runs Style Dictionary build
5. Updates Tailwind config
6. Commits changes
7. Moves to Phase 2: StatBadge component
8. ... continues through all phases
9. Autonomous completion when done

Last Updated: 2025-10-21 Navigator Version: 3.2.0 (target) Skill Version: 1.0.0

alekspetrov

alekspetrov

navigator

View on GitHub

Download Skill Files

View Installation Guide

Download the complete skill directory including SKILL.md and all related files